SARSEN HAULAGE · WEST WOODS → STONEHENGE

The dials

360 least-cost paths, pre-solved over OS Terrain 50. Move a dial to see which landscape factors have to matter for a given corridor to emerge. Solved on a 20 m grid — 1.77 million cells, 14.1 million connections — over BGS geology at 1:50,000. Cross-slope was tested and changes almost nothing, so it is held fixed.

Opens at the preferred setting — climb 14, wet 20, crossing 2000, descent prior moderate — analyst judgements, not model outputs.
Cost of gaining and losing height. Turning this up drives the route into the valleys — it trades wet ground for gentler grades.
Charges soft going two ways and takes the greater, never both: ground that is level and low, and ground on Gault clay or greensand from BGS 1:50,000. Alluvium and peat are measured but not charged — they are largely later than the question.
Charged per stream or river crossed. The strongest lever here: from 13 crossings down to 1, and interfluve use from 17% to 46%.
New Town / Workway (N2) has a road drawn down the face on Andrews & Dury 1773, a holloway with a 73 m drop on 1 m LIDAR, and usable tracks on the ground today. Huish (D2) has only a minor, very narrow farm track. The prior discounts N2 and surcharges N1 across a 600 m catchment on the descent, and nowhere else.
Length
Total ascent
Steepest gradient
Watercourses crossed
Within 200 m of water
On interfluve (dry ridge)
Lowest point
Descent used
On Gault clay
On greensand
On alluvium (not costed)
Elevation along the route
Terrain OS Terrain 50 (OGL), 20 m grid, canal and railway earthworks inpainted out. Watercourses and settlements © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL). Source is a 1 km circle seeded on its perimeter; destination fixed at Stonehenge. Paths are 8-connected on a 40 m grid, so they step in 45° increments and lengths are overstated by up to ~8%. A least-cost path is what the ground permits, not what people did.